Real people, real life #SB1157 – Brynley


Below find a letter from a mom. A real mom being effected by SB1157. A real mom who knows both sides of this fight. An RN, she has had mid-wife assisted hospital births, a cesarean and then a lovely homebirth at home when she was living in Nevada. Now, living a bit south, here in AZ, she’s unable to have another VBAC if this bill passes. This isn’t just about homebirth – many rural hospitals do not do VBACs, forcing women to undergo a cesarean, even if they do not NEED one. Here’s a note from Brynley Mosley and her letter to her ELECTED Senator, Kelli Ward. Published with permission.

Brynley and her family.
Brynley and her family.

Brynley Mosley, lliving in Lake Havasu City, AZ. She currently works at Beacon of Hope Hospice in Lake Havasu City. She has a B.S. in Nursing from Brigham Young University, located in Provo, UT.

Background on SB1157

This last week, I drove three hours from Senator Kelli Ward’s district in Lake Havasu to let my representatives know how this bill affects my freedom and my family. Not only does SB 1157 eviscerate a right we hold most dearly – the right of parents to make decisions, including healthcare decisions, about our own families – it also risks my health and my future babies. I urge you to read what I have to say before you vote on a bill that goes against every principle I stand for as a pro-life Republican and mother.

Her letter to Senator Kelli Ward.

I’m a practicing Registered Nurse with a Bachelor’s degree in Science. I had my first baby in a hospital with an excellent certified midwife, and then twins after that, who were delivered by C-section after a doctor used an invasive procedure to speed up their birth before they were ready, creating a medical emergency. I had my next baby normally, at home in Nevada with a midwife, without surgery or any complications.

When we moved to Arizona, I expected to have my fifth in a hospital – until I found out how Arizona laws and hospital policies force women like me to have surgery, whether we need it or not.

You see, at numerous Arizona hospitals (in 2009, it was almost half of all Arizona maternity wards),(1) women are not allowed to give birth vaginally if they have had a C- section. These liability-based policies are in conflict with current medical evidence and guidelines of major health organizations like the National Institutes of Health(2) the OBs’ own membership organization, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists(3).

For many Arizona women, having a baby at a hospital means mandatory surgery, and with each operation, it becomes more dangerous to carry more babies. Multiple C-sections put women at greater risk for many serious health consequences, including emergency hysterectomy and death, and their future babies at greater risk of death from being housed in a uterus with multiple scars.

What option does this leave women like me, planning on large families, if we can’t have informed consent to give birth the way we want to at our own local hospitals?

To avoid mandatory surgery, for my fifth baby we had to travel three hours one way to a Phoenix hospital to wait out the last two weeks of my pregnancy.

My point in all this is that the state cannot make these decisions for families, to determine where it is “safest” for them to give birth. Only women and their families can weigh their own circumstances and the options available to them. This is a fundamental right of American families. Where we give birth and how we give birth is a basic right.

Furthermore, I am very upset that my own legislator is attempting to call this a pro-life issue. I am shocked that she would characterize her own pro-life constituents in this way, and imply that she or the state cares more about my babies’ lives than I do.

What is Senator Ward’s real agenda?

In fact, one of the obstetricians Senator Ward continually partners with in support of this bill is a vocal proponent of late-term abortion. Some of the words Dr. Maria Manriquez uses to defend the practice of late-term abortion are exactly what she does NOT believe about this issue: “We are deeply troubled by lawmakers’ attempt to legislate the practice of medicine against the standard of care set by the American Congress of Obstetrics & Gynecology (ACOG), our national organization. . . . With these bills, there is little indication that our legislators have weighed the measures’ far-reaching effects. In pursuing a social agenda, they have neglected to account for the health of Arizona’s women.”(5)

Please understand, a bill like this gives me and other Arizona women only two legal options in this state: forced C-sections at the local hospital, or unattended birth at home. Is the state of Arizona ready to put women in this position? Forcing them into surgery, risking their health, and limiting the size of their families – or leaving them to give birth at home alone?

If you must make legislation about birth, please, do something that makes it safer instead of more dangerous: require Arizona hospitals to repeal their mandatory surgery policies and let women decide whether they want to use their own bodies to give birth! I realize these hospitals will make a lot less money this way, but the safety of women and babies is my bottom line.

Ultimately, parents have the right to make these important family decisions, and Senator Ward does not represent us or many of her constituents on this issue. I am joined by 1,600 others who have signed our petition against this ill-conceived bill. Please, vote no on SB 1157 and protect the health and freedom of families like mine.


Brynley Mosley

Do you believe SB1157 does a dis-service to women like Brynley? Show your senators that you do not support SB1157. Click here to visit AZ Voices.



1) International Cesarean Awareness Network, VBAC Bans Info

2) Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights (Report created for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2010)

3) The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin #115: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Bulletins/Committee on Practice Bulletins — Obstetrics/pb115.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20130409T1052140892

4) Silver, R. M., Landon, M. B., Rouse, D. J., & Leveno, K. J. (2006). Maternal Morbidity Associated with Multiple Repeat Cesarean Deliveries. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 107, 1226-32.

5) “Placenta accreta: a risk of Cesarean sections,” – ixzz2tEkzRAOC

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS


  1. Unreal! When I gave birth I was a nervous wreck. I made sure I did my research on hospitals that had a high cesarean rates. I wanted a natural birth and didn’t want to be forced to have a cesarean.

  2. I have four children and had all of them via c-section. The first was due to my failure to fully dialate. The second was because my dr. recommended that I have another c-section due to the fact that he was worried the same thing would happen. When my second child was born, the cord was wrapped around his neck three times and the DR. said that had I waited to go into labor normally he wouldn’t have made it. Because of that, I would never have wished to have regular births. I do think recovery from c-sections are much harder though. I managed recovery with the help of my husband, a lot of help.

  3. Outlawing VBAC is ridiculous. I had one with my 2nd child and had to fight tooth and nail for it. It was banned at all but two hospitals in my state and was a total nightmare to find a doctor who would even talk with me about it.

  4. My doctor would not even consider a c-section unless it was an emergency. It’s amazing that it’s a consideration to make it mandatory, even when not needed, in certain instances.

  5. I certainly hope this does not pass. I think we should be allowed to make the choice of how we birth our babies. I was forced into a probably unnecessary cesarean and while I didn’t mind the recovery I felt cheated out of a natural birthing experience especially knowing that should I choose to have another child I will probably be forced to have another one as well since not many doctors are willing to do a VBAC.

  6. It is absolutely the parent’s choice and ridiculous that they can make a law mandating HOW we deliver babies into the world. I’ve never had a c-section and hope I never do. That being said, I understand if some women ELECT to or if it is an emergency.

  7. What a great letter. So sad in today’s world that people have their own agendas–how about we do what’s right for the Mom and have her in on the decision!! Glad to get more awareness on this topic! thanks for sharing

  8. I do believe a woman has a right to her own decisions about her body as she sees fit, though I do believe a business, which a hospital is, is allowed to make their decisions on if they allow certain procedures or not. This is why a birth plan is so important. Research on your options, etc. I do not agree that there should be an outright state ban on the procedure though.

    1. I agree as well. Hospitals can make that choice. But the state shouldn’t then be able to force women into that hospital via law that prevents trained midwives to assist women with informed consent.

  9. This is a great letter and I hope she is able to accomplish something with this. I think that each birthing experience is unique and a woman should have the right to be able to educated herself and make decisions based on that research.

  10. Hope her letter gets through to what she is trying to accomplish. I’m not sure how politics is involved in personal choices like this but there is certainly room for me to learn

  11. I can’t imagine having to get a C-Section if you don’t need one. I had 4 but all were necessary medically. Now if you’re like me I can understand it but if not then you should be given a choice.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *